Vol. 7 No. 24 (2026) | المقالات

Bridging the Gap Between AI Innovation and Educational Policy:A Framework for Multimodal Instruction in Higher Education

1 Authors
Authors
Zouda Mohamed Riadh
Zo
Published
2026-11-07
Section
المقالات
Abstract

Universities want the benefits of AI, but they are also under pressure to build legal and ethical safeguards that protect student learning, and the two aims do not always sit comfortably together. This paper looks at how AI-based multimodal instruction relates to critical thinking, and it reads the results against ongoing regulatory debates about AI in education. As governments and international bodies work out how to govern generative AI, regulation will need to line up with teaching approaches that demonstrably improve cognitive outcomes. I draw on a mixed-methods study of 87 third-year English majors to examine how combining text, image, audio, and interactive AI agents affects critical thinking in content courses, and to identify the cognitive mechanisms these environments appear to trigger. I then set the findings beside regulatory approaches that emphasize data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and academic integrity. My argument is that a purely restrictive legal approach risks stifling educational innovation, whereas a purely permissive one may weaken critical engagement when students are not adequately supported. The paper proposes a Pedagogical-Legal Framework in which AI literacy complements regulation. By tying evidence on multimodal learning to institutional and legal mandates, the framework offers educators and policymakers a way to cultivate critical thinking in an AI-augmented era. I conclude that developers, legal experts, and educators need to work together if future regulation is to support deep critical inquiry in higher education rather than inhibit it.

Keywords
Artificial intelligence Multimodal instruction Critical thinking Educational regulation Higher education AI literacy
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References
31 References
  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77– 101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. Castellanos-Reyes, D., Villarreal, M. E., & Ramirez, M. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI ChatGPT on critical thinking in higher education: Passive AI-directed use or human– AI supported collaboration? Education Sciences, 15(9), Article 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091198
  3. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-3
  4. Costa, O. P., Leitão, C., & Coelho, J. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education students’ critical thinking skills. Computers&Education, 210, Article 104968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104968
  5. European Commission. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689
  6. Gonsalves, C. (2024). Generative AI’s impact on critical thinking: Revisiting Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241305980
  7. Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation. Computers&Education, 194, Article 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104710
  8. Hou, Y., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence amplifies the role of critical thinking skills and reduces reliance on prior knowledge while promoting in-depth learning. Education Sciences, 15(5), Article 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050554
  9. Kimmel, S. (2024). Project-based learning with generative AI: Fostering creative problem posing in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology&Society, 27(2), 112– 128.
  10. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
  11. Lee, G., Shi, L., Latif, E., & others. (2025). Multimodality of AI for education: Towards artificial general intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18(1), 45– 58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2025.1234567
  12. Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Real-time feedback mechanisms in AI-enhanced learning environments: Effects on metacognitive engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 891– 912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10234-5
  13. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (Eds.). (2022). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  15. Mayer, R. E., Griffiths, C., & Johnson, C. L. (2025). A meta-analysis of Richard Mayer’s multimedia learning research: Searching for boundary conditions of design principles across multiple media types. Review of Educational Research, 95(2), 234– 267. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241234567
  16. Nasr, G. S., Kaczkó, D., & Ostendorf, M. (2025). Challenges in promoting genuine critical thinking in AI-driven educational environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 45– 62.
  17. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (8th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
  18. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385– 407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  19. Putra, P. O., Hidayat, R., & others. (2023). Students’ uncritical acceptance of AI-generated content: A study of cognitive offloading in digital learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 78– 95.
  20. Qi, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, W. (2024). Productive failure in AI-mediated learning: How algorithmic errors catalyze critical evaluation. Learning and Instruction, 89, Article 101789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101789
  21. Sun, Z., Lin, C. H., & others. (2024). Over-reliance on ChatGPT in programming education: Effects on problem-solving and conceptual understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, Article 108034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108034
  22. Swiss Cyber Institute. (2025). The EU AI Act: Implications for ethical AI in education [Research brief]. https://swisscyberinstitute.com/research/eu-ai-act-implications-ethical-ai-in-education/
  23. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://doi.org/10.54675/IFOF7276
  24. UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
  25. U.S. Department of Education. (2025). Dear colleague letter: Leveraging federal grant funds to improve education outcomes through artificial intelligence. Office of the Secretary. https://www.ed.gov/
  26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  27. Wang, Y., & Fan, Y. (2025). Does generative artificial intelligence improve students’ higher-order thinking? A meta-analysis based on 29 experiments and quasi-experiments. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09842-1
  28. WCET. (2025, August 11). Understanding the Trump administration’s educational AI policies. WCET Frontiers. https://wcet.wiche.edu/frontiers/2025/08/11/understanding-the-trump-administrations-educational-ai-policies/
  29. Xu, J., Chen, L., & Li, M. (2024). Self-regulated learning as a mediator of Gen-AI use and critical thinking development. Computers&Education, 215, Article 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105023
  30. Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2024). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5650– 5664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693
  31. Zhou, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, T. (2024). Self-regulated learning and Gen-AI: Moderating effects on higher-order thinking skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1567– 1589. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13456
Stats
Total Views
Total Downloads
Published
2026-11-07
Full Text
PDF
application/pdf
Downloads

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.